咨询热线 

0371-6939386

当前位置:主页 > 新闻中心

安布:在没中锋的情况下,普利希奇搭莱奥可能存在兼容问题(安布:缺少中锋支点时,普利希奇与莱奥或难以兼容)
日期:2026-01-14    来源:开云

Considering player formations

I’m thinking about proposing Pulisic as a false nine, Leao on the left, and maybe adding right winger Chukwueze or Okafor centrally as options. However, without a true striker, I’m not sure if Okafor fits the role. For AC Milan's 23/24 setup, Giroud is the primary nine, with Okafor and Jovic as backups.

Additionally, I can consider the constraints around natural language coding and focus on providing concise analysis with actionable suggestions in bullet points. Should I also ask if there are plans for a specific opponent's lineup?Analyzing attacking dynamics

I need to break down the problem mechanics, noting that both players like to receive the ball wide and drive inside to shoot or cut back. Without a central striker, it can lead to issues since center-backs might step out to block lanes, making crosses ineffective and weak at the far post.

I see a few ways to mitigate these issues. One option could be to use a false nine role for Pulisic, with Chukwueze on the right and Leao on the left. I could suggest other formations or positioning strategies as well.

确实有这个风险。莱奥和普利希奇都更偏“要球到脚、内收找配合/射门”的类型,一旦没有能牵制中卫的中锋,几个问题会被放大:

希奇都更偏

  • 中路缺少“定海针”:没有人压住两名中卫,CB敢前顶干扰莱奥、普利希奇拿球,二人频繁内收会在同侧半空间拥堵。
  • 禁区占位不足:传中和横传的终点没人,后点攻击也不稳定,弱侧远端经常空着。
  • 纵深威胁下降:两翼都来脚下接应,身后跑动少,线路被压扁,转身反击也缺少第一时间的直插点。
  • 防守转攻和高位逼抢的首触点缺:没有背身做墙的人,RLC/雷因德斯的二线插上价值被削弱。

可操作的应对思路(在“无中锋”的前提下):

  • 角色分工硬规定:一边“踩线拉宽”,一边“半空间吃肋”。优先让莱奥保持左路一对一与爆破,普利希奇更多走右肋内收做三角。
  • 指定禁区跑位责任:RLC负责前点冲刺,普利希奇或右后卫(卡拉布里亚/弗洛伦齐)攻后点,雷因德斯埋弧顶二点;传中以低平球与倒三角为主。
  • 伪9方案A:普利希奇伪9,右边用楚克乌泽拉宽。普利希奇回撤做“墙”,RLC、莱奥、特奥承担吃身后和攻门任务,形成3到4个持续冲禁区的人。
  • 伪9方案B:莱奥居中打“跑9”,左边用奥卡福/普利希奇。要求莱奥少回撤、多攻击中卫身后,右侧内锋负责拿球与分配。
  • 全队结构微调:进攻期踢3-2-5(特奥高站、右后卫收内),用边中后卫/后腰前压来“钉住”对方一名中卫,腾出莱奥单边爆破通道。
  • 逼抢触发修正:无9时用4-4-2影子阵,普利希奇/莱奥中的一人居中起跳逼抢,另一人收内封中,RLC跟进吃二点,确保首抢后能把球护住。

如果你有具体对手/可用人员(比如是否能上奥卡福、楚克乌泽、特奥状态等),我可以给出更细的首发与跑位细则和几套定位球/反击脚本。